Next: 3.10.4 Code Configuration
Up: 3.10 Baroclinic Gyre MITgcm
Previous: 3.10.2 Equations solved
Contents
Subsections
3.10.3 Discrete Numerical Configuration
The domain is discretised with
a uniform grid spacing in latitude and longitude
, so
that there are sixty grid cells in the zonal and meridional directions.
Vertically the
model is configured with four layers with constant depth,
, of
m. The internal, locally orthogonal, model coordinate
variables
and
are initialized from the values of
,
,
and
in
radians according to
The procedure for generating a set of internal grid variables from a
spherical polar grid specification is discussed in section
.
As described in 2.16, the time evolution of potential
temperature,
, (equation 3.17)
is evaluated prognostically. The centered second-order scheme with
Adams-Bashforth time stepping described in section
2.16.1 is used to step forward the temperature
equation. Prognostic terms in
the momentum equations are solved using flux form as
described in section .
The pressure forces that drive the fluid motions, (
and
), are found by summing pressure due to surface
elevation
and the hydrostatic pressure. The hydrostatic part of the
pressure is diagnosed explicitly by integrating density. The sea-surface
height,
, is diagnosed using an implicit scheme. The pressure
field solution method is described in sections
2.4 and
.
3.10.3.1 Numerical Stability Criteria
The Laplacian viscosity coefficient,
, is set to
.
This value is chosen to yield a Munk layer width,
 |
|
|
(3.24) |
of
km. This is greater than the model
resolution in mid-latitudes
at
, ensuring that the frictional
boundary layer is well resolved.
The model is stepped forward with a
time step
secs. With this time step the stability
parameter to the horizontal Laplacian friction
 |
|
|
(3.25) |
evaluates to 0.012, which is well below the 0.3 upper limit
for stability for this term under ABII time-stepping.
The vertical dissipation coefficient,
, is set to
. The associated stability limit
 |
|
|
(3.26) |
evaluates to
which is again well below
the upper limit.
The values of
and
are also used for the horizontal (
)
and vertical (
) diffusion coefficients for temperature respectively.
The numerical stability for inertial oscillations
 |
|
|
(3.27) |
evaluates to
, which is well below the
upper
limit for stability.
The advective CFL for a extreme maximum
horizontal flow
speed of
 |
|
|
(3.28) |
evaluates to
. This is well below the stability
limit of 0.5.
The stability parameter for internal gravity waves
propagating at
 |
|
|
(3.29) |
evaluates to
. This is well below the linear
stability limit of 0.25.
Next: 3.10.4 Code Configuration
Up: 3.10 Baroclinic Gyre MITgcm
Previous: 3.10.2 Equations solved
Contents
mitgcm-support@mitgcm.org
| Copyright © 2006
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
Last update 2010-08-24 |
 |
|